Commons talk:Licensing

COMMONS DISCUSSION PAGES (index)

• Commons Help desk
• Village pump (general discussion)
  • Copyright
  • Proposals
  • Technical
• Graphics and photography discussion
  • Photography critiques
  • Image improvement
    • Illustration workshop
    • Map workshop
    • Photography workshop
    • Video and sound workshop
• Categories for discussion
• Undeletion requests
• Deletion requests
• Volunteer Response Team/Noticeboard
• Translators' noticeboard
• Work requests for bots

---

• Contact administrators
  • Vandalism
  • User problems (Dispute resolution)
  • Blocks and protections
• Bureaucrats' noticeboard
• CheckUser requests
• Oversight requests

---

• Telegram
• IRC ^webchat
• Commons mailing list (archive)
• Commons' bugs on Phabricator

Shortcut

• CT:L

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to Commons:Licensing.

• This is not a forum for general discussion of the page's subject.
• Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
• Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~).
• New to Commons? Check out the project scope. Ask questions, get answers.

For discussions of specific copyright questions, please go to Commons:Village pump/Copyright. Discussions that do not relate to changes to the page Commons:Licensing may be moved, with participants notified with the template {{subst:moved to VPC|Commons talk:Licensing}}.

For old discussions, see the Archives. Recent sections with no replies for 14 days may be archived.

Other archives

Seven 2006/2007 discussions organized as subpages, ignoringincl. comments added in 2014:

• ADRM
• Review of license templates
• U.S. patents
• Ecoport copyleft
• Museums Bilder (in German)
• Explaining why Derivative Work and Commercial Use must be allowed
• Which countries' copyright laws determine copyright status?

image from VectorStock.com

This appears to be a commercial image website, and I don't see anything there that would allow us to use their images. I came across File:Airplane-line-path-air-plane-flight-route-vector-30110244.jpg which appears to be a simple grab from their site. Should I submit a COM:DR for this or is there a reason this is okay? Josh (talk) 19:16, 9 December 2023 (UTC)

@Joshbaumgartner: Uploaded by someone with a grand total of 6 edits to Commons, and who most likely did not understand how licensing works. - Jmabel ! talk 02:06, 10 December 2023 (UTC)

@Jmabel and Joshbaumgartner: I tried to report it, but ended up hitting the spam blacklist, causing this edit. I then found another method of reporting it.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me}🇺🇦 02:14, 10 December 2023 (UTC)

@Jeff G., @Jmabel, thanks for your responses. Licensing and DRs aren't something I do much with, so I appreciate the feedback, and thanks for adding the copyvio tag. If I see other similar ones, I'll follow that example. Josh (talk) 02:28, 10 December 2023 (UTC)

@Joshbaumgartner: You're welcome.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me}🇺🇦 02:40, 10 December 2023 (UTC)

Rules for AI created content

Policies need to be updated and have to take content into account, that has been created by an, or with the assistance of an AI. The problem came up on the Village pump on 7 December 23 [1] and the following days, additionally, people who are really into AI and often seem to advocate for handling AI content like other media, have their special place under Commons:AI-generated media. Alexpl (talk) 09:10, 11 December 2023 (UTC)

@Alexpl: Well, they have their AI-generated uploads there. If you want to make a proposal, please post a new section to COM:VPP.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me}🇺🇦 12:15, 11 December 2023 (UTC)