Commons:Oversighters/Requests

Requests for Oversight rights

watch

When complete, pages listed here should be archived to Commons:Oversighters/Archive.

• Please read Commons:Oversighters before voting here. Any logged in user may vote, although those who have few or no previous edits may not be fully counted.

Kadı

Related requests:

• Administrators/Requests/Kadı

• Oversighters/Requests/Kadı

Vote

Kadı (talk · contributions · deleted user contributions · recent activity · logs · block log · global contribs · CentralAuth)

Scheduled to end: 10:15, 22 December 2023 (UTC)

Hello, I am Kadı. I serve as an administrator on Commons, also I am a global renamer and VRT agent. I am requesting oversight access in order to work on this area. Sincerely, --Kadı Message 10:15, 8 December 2023 (UTC)

Votes

•  Oppose, I am not satisfied by your responses to Krd. ─ The Aafī (^talk) 18:27, 9 December 2023 (UTC)

Comments

• IMO not sufficient explanation why you need the flag. Did I miss something, was there any discussion that more oversighters were needed? Thanks, --A.Savin 11:36, 8 December 2023 (UTC)

  @A.Savin, thanks for the question. You didn't miss something because there was not a discussion about more oversighters were needed. I am requesting this flag, because I am working on renaming and VRT area. In this area, in some cases oversight access is needed for suppressing personal info, private location coordinates etc. I am an active user, so if I get this flag, I will have a chance to evaluate the requests and do whatever needed. Regards, Kadı Message 14:25, 8 December 2023 (UTC)

  I think for suppressing private coordinates usually admin's revdel is enough, but I may be wrong wrt some cases. --A.Savin 18:00, 8 December 2023 (UTC)

  @A.Savin, I requested suppression for this file's coordinates because the coordinates was private, that's an example. Kadı Message 18:04, 8 December 2023 (UTC)

  The mentioned example appears to be your own upload. Are you planning to oversight own edits? Are there other cases where you have requested oversight? Krd 20:45, 8 December 2023 (UTC)

  @Krd, no that's an example. I am not planning to oversight my edits, I am requesting this flag for contributing to Commons in that area. For example, if someone mails to VRT about oversighting, I can evaluate the issue. Best, Kadı Message 21:46, 8 December 2023 (UTC)

  Excluding the example given above, how many times did you request oversight in the last 12 months? Krd 07:54, 9 December 2023 (UTC)

  I do not remember. But, I remember a suppress request in global rename queue. If I get this flag, I will have a chance to evaluate. Kadı Message 08:45, 9 December 2023 (UTC)

  what's the point, to suppress that photo's coords. it can be easily geotagged with the aid of satellite images. (it's already categorised to the village.) removing its coords only makes it a tiny bit more difficult to pinpoint the location of that photo.

  and like others have said, in that case isnt a revdel enough? what is the chance that out of the several hundred sysops someone might abuse that little piece of not-so-secret info? RZuo (talk) 12:09, 9 December 2023 (UTC)

  Agreed. Just for something like complete private data including street address, an oversighter is definitely needed. --A.Savin 19:21, 9 December 2023 (UTC)

  What's the harm in suppressing the coordinates if an uploader asks for them to be suppressed? I'd hate to think I'd be totally screwed if I accidently included the coordinates in an image of something in my backyard that I uploaded Commons. Sure, someone could technically find out where it was taken using satellite images, but so what? The same goes for any other private information. At that point why not leave addresses and phone numbers in file descriptions because both can easily be found using a Google Search? --Adamant1 (talk) 21:17, 9 December 2023 (UTC)

  I agree with A. Savin. A revdel of coordinates is sufficient. Abzeronow (talk) 23:18, 9 December 2023 (UTC)