User talk:Eugene a

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Hey, I've looked at some of your uploads, and you seem to be putting the date you uploaded the picture to commons in the "Date" field. The date field is for when the work was created, not when you uploaded the work. See Template:Information#Template_parameters. Thanks. --Skottniss (talk) 07:20, 31 May 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Official opening of Belomorkanal article.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Underlying lk (talk) 02:10, 26 August 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

update source[edit]

Could you update the direct source if you overwrite a file with new images in the future? That would be helpful for future tracking and source integrity. Such as:

Cheers, Cold Season (talk) 20:18, 13 November 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please do not overwrite files[edit]

čeština  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  français  galego  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  Nederlands (informeel)‎  polski  português  sicilianu  slovenčina  svenska  Türkçe  suomi  македонски  русский  українська  हिन्दी  മലയാളം  日本語  中文  עברית  فارسی  +/−


I noticed that you uploaded a file using the name File:Presentation of the Virgin - Capella dei Scrovegni - Padua 2016.jpg. A file by this name already existed on Commons. Overwriting an existing file should not be done except when making minor, uncontroversial corrections, so the file has been restored to its previous version. If the file that you attempted to upload is within our project scope and is in the public domain or published under a free license, please upload it again under a different name. Thank you. For more information, please see Commons:Overwriting files.

Darwin Ahoy! 14:08, 10 December 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You have been warned before, but you still overwrote File:Francesco del Cossa 016.jpg. Please don't. Multichill (talk) 21:23, 16 January 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Your position is rather strange. I overwrite the files and change the bad ones to the good ones. I do this on purpose so that the articles immediately contain good files, and not bad ones like now. The sources of these files are museums, since all of these paintings are in museums. Isn't that clear? Why are you forbidding me to do this? What rules am I breaking? I'm sure it's best for Wikipedia users.
Pay attention to copyright
File:Dragpa Gyaltshen (1147-1216), fifth throne holder of Sakya First half of 16th century. Mindröl Ling monastery, Central Tibet.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

LX (talk, contribs) 19:32, 21 February 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Giovanni Bellini, portrait of Doge Leonardo Loredan.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

65.154.61.162 15:45, 13 July 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Grunewald Isenheim3.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 20:15, 14 August 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Capella Strozzi2 Hell.jpg[edit]

asturianu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  euskara  français  galego  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  македонски  русский  українська  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Capella Strozzi2 Hell.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Capella Strozzi2 Hell.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Castillo blanco (talk) 10:44, 31 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Capella Strozzi7.jpg[edit]

asturianu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  euskara  français  galego  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  македонски  русский  українська  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Capella Strozzi7.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Capella Strozzi7.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Castillo blanco (talk) 10:44, 31 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, in 2011 you uploaded a completely different image of this object, which was rightly quickly reverted. Do you know how to get your image as a new & different file? This would be useful. Johnbod (talk) 04:42, 16 April 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Use Of Image[edit]

Hello,

I'm writing from DK, the world's leading illustrated reference publisher and a part of the Penguin Random House group. You can view our books at www.dk.com.

We're currently creating a book titled Great Cities. For a spread on Hampi, we would like to use the image posted by you on wikipedia of Battle of Talikota- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Battle_of_Talikota_complete_panorama.png.

Could you let us know if we could feature it in our book and if you would be able to provide us with a high-resolution file?

By agreeing to let us use these images we understand we have your consent to use these images in all editions in all forms of Great Cities (including digital products based on Great Cities) in all languages throughout the world.

We look forward to hearing from you and would be happy to answer any queries you might have regarding this request or publication.

      • I don't have a file with a higher resolution than this one. You can use it as you like.

Hi. The description of your file says that this detail is of the painted cross in the church of Santa Maria dei Servi in Siena, but it is not. Can you please identify which painted cross this detail is? Thank you very much. Best regards, DenghiùComm (talk) 09:48, 3 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Zhou Fang. Court Ladies Playing Double-sixes. Freer Gallery of Art.jpg, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest pictures on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Zhou Fang. Court Ladies Playing Double-sixes. Freer Gallery of Art.jpg. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 8 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]