User talk:Jon Harald Søby

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
◄◄ User talk:Jon Harald Søby
Archives: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6



Hei, kan du flytte kommunegrensen mellom Sande og Vanylven? Fastlandsdelen til Sande ble i år 2000 overført til Vanylven. --Eivindgh (talk) 07:09, 27 May 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard[edit]

Hi, on the OTRS memberlist I noticed you are active on commons and have acces to info-no. A question came in on the OTRS/Noticeboard [1]. Concerning this question; in the last day two email where received ticket:2011022010007832 and ticket:2011022010004362. Part of one email is in Norwegian. Could you please have a look. Thank you very much. Kind regards, Taketa (talk) 10:47, 21 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

It says I don't have access to the first one (do you know which queue it is?); the second one checks out, so everything is in order. Jon Harald Søby (talk) 20:06, 21 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Good to hear the second one checks out. The first one is at permissions-commons. Maybe you can acces it through [2]? -- Taketa (talk) 06:18, 22 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Still doesn't work... If you move it to info-no it should work though. Jon Harald Søby (talk) 08:09, 22 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Another volunteer has answered the ticket. No further action needed. Thank you for your effort, kind regards, Taketa (talk) 12:29, 24 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Okay, good. No problem. :-) Jon Harald Søby (talk) 13:30, 24 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The Capitol, Republic of Palau (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Deleting intermediate uploads of a file[edit]

Hello, Jon Harald Søby.

I was wondering if it's ok to do on this file what you've done with this. Can all versions of my file, but the current one, be deleted? I'm asking this because i'm afraid that so many miniatures may be putting unnecessary strain on the servers. That file matters for nothing. That's only a flag of mine. I'm waiting your feedback. --Bluedenim (talk) 18:15, 18 March 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

no localization[edit]

thanks for the sitenotice localization. Can you also do the same for the script the notice relates to? You can edit User:Rd232/myuploads.js directly or leave a note at User talk:Rd232/myuploads.js. cheers, Rd232 (talk) 12:56, 13 September 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Wikimedia Turkey is in discussion, would it be possible for you to update the svg? Thanks. -- とある白い猫 ちぃ? 21:40, 1 November 2011 (UTC)

m:Wikimedia chapters has more entries that maybe added to the map. -- とある白い猫 ちぃ? 21:58, 1 November 2011 (UTC)

Beskyttelsen på File:Flag of Norway.svg[edit]

Hei kan du fjerne beskyttelsen på File:Flag of Norway.svg? --Peter Kaino Jensen (talk) 19:57, 22 November 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Nei, jeg er ikke administrator her. Spør på Commons:Administrators' noticeboard. Jon Harald Søby (talk) 01:45, 24 November 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Har ikke trua, kjenner du ikke noen her er det som å rope i en tom skog. --Peter Kaino Jensen (talk) 23:56, 24 November 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Hi! I created the Commons:WikiProject Dacia as a sister project to WP:DACIA English and WP:DACIA română to better organize, categorize and improve the quality of media and galleries related to ancient Dacia. From your contributions, I think you might be interested and maybe you wish to join and support the project. Your input is welcomed! Thanks and best regards!

... and happy holidays! --Codrin.B (talk) 22:07, 22 December 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi! I created the Commons:WikiProject Romania as a sister project to the multilingual WP:ROMANIA versions (currently en, fr, ro and ru) to better organize, categorize and improve the quality of media and galleries related to Romania and the Romanians. From your contributions, I think you might be interested and maybe you wish to join and support the project. Your input is welcomed! Thanks and best regards!

--Codrin.B (talk) 22:39, 3 February 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:EBU Member.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

lateiner (talk) 23:00, 23 May 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Pay attention to licensing
Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content: images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose.

File:The Phantom, Australian Woman's Mirror 2.jpg seems to be free (or it would be proposed for deletion), but it was identified as having a wrong license. Usually, it is because a public domain image is tagged with a free license, or because the stated source or other information is not sufficient to prove the selected tag is correct. Please verify that you applied the correct license tag for this file.

If you believe this file has the correct license, please explain why on the file discussion page.

العربية  Deutsch  English  español  français  日本語  മലയാളം  polski  português  slovenščina  svenska  Tiếng Việt  +/−

Stefan4 (talk) 02:02, 15 October 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Pay attention to licensing
Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content: images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose.

File:The Phantom, Australian Woman's Mirror 3.jpg seems to be free (or it would be proposed for deletion), but it was identified as having a wrong license. Usually, it is because a public domain image is tagged with a free license, or because the stated source or other information is not sufficient to prove the selected tag is correct. Please verify that you applied the correct license tag for this file.

If you believe this file has the correct license, please explain why on the file discussion page.

العربية  Deutsch  English  español  français  日本語  മലയാളം  polski  português  slovenščina  svenska  Tiếng Việt  +/−

Stefan4 (talk) 02:03, 15 October 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Pay attention to licensing
Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content: images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose.

File:The Phantom, Australian Woman's Mirror 4.jpg seems to be free (or it would be proposed for deletion), but it was identified as having a wrong license. Usually, it is because a public domain image is tagged with a free license, or because the stated source or other information is not sufficient to prove the selected tag is correct. Please verify that you applied the correct license tag for this file.

If you believe this file has the correct license, please explain why on the file discussion page.

العربية  Deutsch  English  español  français  日本語  മലയാളം  polski  português  slovenščina  svenska  Tiếng Việt  +/−

Stefan4 (talk) 02:03, 15 October 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Pay attention to licensing
Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content: images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose.

File:The Phantom, Australian Woman's Mirror.jpg seems to be free (or it would be proposed for deletion), but it was identified as having a wrong license. Usually, it is because a public domain image is tagged with a free license, or because the stated source or other information is not sufficient to prove the selected tag is correct. Please verify that you applied the correct license tag for this file.

If you believe this file has the correct license, please explain why on the file discussion page.

العربية  Deutsch  English  español  français  日本語  മലയാളം  polski  português  slovenščina  svenska  Tiếng Việt  +/−

Stefan4 (talk) 02:03, 15 October 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Svar[edit]

Hello, Jon Harald Søby. You have new messages at Stefan4's talk page.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  বাংলা  català  čeština  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  español  suomi  français  galego  हिन्दी  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  ქართული  македонски  മലയാളം  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenščina  svenska  Tagalog  Türkçe  简体中文  繁體中文  +/−

Stefan4 (talk) 19:59, 16 October 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, russavia (talk) 20:38, 19 June 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Nauru airport entrance.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

russavia (talk) 21:39, 19 June 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:DowntownSF.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Diannaa (talk) 01:22, 29 October 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Haninge kommun[edit]

Hej, kan du byta ut Haninge kommuns kommunvapen mot det rätta?

Your account will be renamed[edit]

21:16, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

File:Nauru Airport.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Presmx (talk) 11:25, 28 November 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Kilimanjaro Lager.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Taivo (talk) 10:20, 13 March 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:People evacuating 2011 Dar es Salaam bomb disaster area.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Taivo (talk) 10:29, 13 March 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Nyhetsbrev fra Wikimedia Norge[edit]

Jon Harald Søby (WMNO) 17:04, 1 November 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Nyhetsbrev fra Wikimedia Norge[edit]

Jon Harald Søby (WMNO) 16:48, 20 December 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Nyhetsbrev fra Wikimedia Norge[edit]

Jon Harald Søby (WMNO) 16:32, 10 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Nyhetsbrev fra Wikimedia Norge[edit]

Jon Harald Søby (WMNO) 16:07, 3 May 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Nyhetsbrev fra Wikimedia Norge[edit]

Jon Harald Søby (WMNO) 15:49, 1 September 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Microsoft Office 2007 text logo.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jon Kolbert (talk) 20:44, 8 October 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Wiki Science Competition 2017 closes on December, the 15th[edit]

Hi, "Wiki Science Competition" 2017 has started

It is a world event.
The upload phase in Asian, American and European countries without juries ends on December 15th.
Here you can find more details.

This is a manually inserted message for commons users with knowledge of the English language who are also globally active or who have uploaded images related to the competition's themes (science buildings, microscopic images, scientists, wildlife...).

#WSC2017 #WikiScience #WikiScience2017

Wiki Science Competition

--Alexmar983 (talk) 06:15, 7 December 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Nyhetsbrev fra Wikimedia Norge[edit]

Jon Harald Søby (WMNO) 22:29, 20 December 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Nyhetsbrev fra Wikimedia Norge[edit]

Jon Harald Søby (WMNO) 08:39, 7 February 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Kart over Eidfjord[edit]

Hei, kan du fikse File:Norway Hordaland - Eidfjord.svg slik at også den vestre delen av kommunen blir fargelagt (slik som her)? - 4ing (talk) 09:24, 20 March 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@4ing: Fiksa! Jon Harald Søby (talk) 09:40, 20 March 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Nyhetsbrev fra Wikimedia Norge[edit]

Jon Harald Søby (WMNO) 23:43, 14 May 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Flag of Cornwall.svg[edit]

asturianu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  euskara  français  galego  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  македонски  русский  українська  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Flag of Cornwall.svg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Yours sincerely,   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 05:00, 19 June 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Jeff G.: Seriously? Jon Harald Søby (talk) 21:42, 19 June 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Seriously. What was your source? How old is this flag?   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 05:06, 20 June 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Jeff G.: It's four black rectangles… No way that's copyrightable. Jon Harald Søby (talk) 11:28, 20 June 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I didn't think so. I added "; see also en:Saint Piran's Flag" to your statement of source.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 15:15, 20 June 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Nyhetsbrev fra Wikimedia Norge[edit]

Jon Harald Søby (WMNO) 11:33, 27 August 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

missing source[edit]

103.92.43.248 19:38, 5 November 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

103.92.42.181 10:02, 6 November 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Nyhetsbrev fra Wikimedia Norge[edit]

Jon Harald Søby (WMNO) 23:16, 17 December 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Nyhetsbrev fra Wikimedia Norge[edit]

Jon Harald Søby (WMNO) 14:18, 7 May 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Nyhetsbrev frå Wikimedia Noreg[edit]

Jon Harald Søby (WMNO) 15:10, 12 August 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Re: Rate limits[edit]

Moving 2 files in 4 minutes is certainly not supposed to hit the rate limit, which is 8 per minute. If you need more than that, maybe you could suggest adding the "noratelimit" permission to the file mover group. Nemo 09:01, 19 September 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Nemo bis: Yeah, what's weird is that I didn't get the rate limit for the first file move (with the Move&Replace gadget), but I got it for the second one. For the second one, it worked after 180 seconds. However, while trying to move Category:Paul Dalhø to Category:Paul Dahlø, I'm still getting it. Before this reply now I haven't made any edits in 22 minutes. Before I tried to move that category the first time I hadn't moved anything in ~21 hours. Jon Harald Søby (talk) 09:15, 19 September 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Nyhetsbrev fra Wikimedia Norge[edit]

Jon Harald Søby (WMNO) 14:16, 6 November 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Important message for file movers[edit]

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

  • To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
  • To perform file name swaps.
  • When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:35, 7 November 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Wikimedia movement affiliates.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

41.113.201.128 11:27, 9 December 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Nyhetsbrev fra Wikimedia Norge[edit]

Jon Harald Søby (WMNO) 12:01, 21 January 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Wikimedia Norges årsmøte blir virtuelt[edit]

Jon Harald Søby (WMNO) 12:31, 12 March 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Nyhetsbrev fra Wikimedia Norge[edit]

Jon Harald Søby (WMNO) 17:22, 28 April 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Nyhetsbrev fra Wikimedia Norge[edit]

Jon Harald Søby (WMNO) 12:50, 1 September 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Kart Indre Østfold.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Worldlydev (talk) 21:14, 5 September 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Wikimedia Norgga ođasreive[edit]

Jon Harald Søby (WMNO 09:56, 20 October 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Nyhetsbrev nr. 19 fra Wikimedia Norge[edit]

Jon Harald Søby (WMNO) 14:11, 15 January 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Yaghnobi speaking areas.jpg[edit]

العربية  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  italiano  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Yaghnobi speaking areas.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

(talk) 20:53, 14 April 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Nyhetsbrev nr. 20 fra Wikimedia Norge[edit]

Jon Harald Søby (WMNO) 14:40, 20 April 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Nyhetsbrev nr. 21 fra Wikimedia Norge[edit]

Jon Harald Søby 12:40, 28 May 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Nyhetsbrev nr. 22 fra Wikimedia Norge[edit]

Jon Harald Søby (WMNO) 13:59, 12 August 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Nyhetsbrev nr. 23 fra Wikimedia Norge[edit]

Jon Harald Søby (WMNO) 15:16, 3 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Grensekart nr. 21.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Grensekart nr. 21.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:00, 9 December 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Nyhetsbrev nr. 24 fra Wikimedia Norge[edit]

Jon Harald Søby (WMNO) 15:03, 3 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Jon Harald Søby,
Thank you for your contributions to Commons. I noticed File:Supranational European Bodies-nb.svg is out of date. Russia is no longer a member of Council of Europe Could you update it? Thanks again. Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 10:15, 5 April 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Template:Monument Norge[edit]

Hei, kunne du sett om du kan endre Template:Monument Norge slik at f.eks. File:Baby-Begby 1 WLM22.jpg ikke havner i Category:Cultural heritage monuments in Norway with invalid IDs? 4ing (talk) 16:09, 17 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@4ing: Fiksa! Jon Harald Søby (talk) 15:50, 25 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Takk! Category:Allersgården ligger nå både i Category:Cultural heritage monuments in Norway with invalid IDs og Category:Cultural heritage monuments in Norway with known IDs. Det skyldes vel mellomrommet før ID-nummeret i malen, men uansett burde den vel ikke ha havnet i begge kategoriene? Jeg har lagt inn en fiks, sjekker du om den ser grei ut? - 4ing (talk) 19:40, 25 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@4ing: Jah, ser helt greit ut! Jeg hadde den egentlig med faktisk, men så tenkte jeg «neh, det trengs sikkert ikke» (som regel strippes jo whitespace i wikitekst, men «hvor i løya» det skjer er jeg ikke sikker på), men så feil kan man ta. 😅 Jon Harald Søby (talk) 19:58, 25 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Kan du se om det er mulig å få lenker til kulturmiljøer (ID begynner med K) til å peke til riktig side? Nå omdirigeres de til en generell side, se f.eks. File:Kongsberg Vestsiden IMG 1427 rk K-44.jpg. Lenken burde ha gått til [3]. - 4ing (talk) 10:57, 27 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@4ing: Ja, den har irritert meg litt også. Så vidt jeg har funnet ut av er det ingen måte å lenke til dem ved kun å bruke k###-ID-en, og det er jo lite gunstig. Tror det er noe Riksantikvaren må fikse, men jeg har en kontakt der jeg kan spørre. Jon Harald Søby (talk) 11:00, 27 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Nyhetsbrev nr. 25 fra Wikimedia Norge[edit]

Jon Harald Søby (WMNO) 13:51, 22 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Request for license review[edit]

Quantified Human by Alan Warburton

Hello, I do not think we have collaborated in the past. I found your name on Special:ListUsers/image-reviewer, and I am looking for someone to do a license review as described at Commons:Village_pump/Copyright#AI_artwork_-_license_review_requested. The situation is that I want to upload some AI-generated artwork where copyright is not typical. Also I think this will be a recurring issue for Commons review in the future, and I wanted to get any kind of comment on this from people who do license review. I am messaging you because I I browsed your contribution history and saw that you recently participated in copyright review. I messaged two other people in the same way for this issue.

If you are interested and available to comment, then please do so at the village pump or on the image talk page. I am hoping that review takes 5 minutes at most. If you are not comfortable reviewing this image, then commenting that would also be helpful so that I know to escalate the issue to other kinds of review. Thanks. Bluerasberry (talk) 19:45, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Bluerasberry: Hi, thanks for reaching out! This is too far outside my area of expertise, I think. All the image reviewing I do is just double-checking Flickr uploads basically, which is a lot more cut-and-dry than this. The rationale you've given on the talk page does make sense though, but it still "feels" like it's based on a photograph – and how can one prove that it's not (prove a negative)? IDK, it's probably fine, but getting some extra opinions seems like a good idea. Jon Harald Søby (talk) 00:24, 30 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi (and happy new year), can you please translate these new lines?

"relgen-common-ver-v1": "Version",
"relgen-common-dev-v1": "developed and maintained by",
"relgen-common-loading-v1": "Loading …" 

Thank you! --Ruthven (msg) 17:22, 2 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Sure! The message "relgen-common-dev" should really have $1 though, it is not given that the name of the developer/maintainer will always come last in that sentence in every language.
The translations are:
  • Versjon
  • utviklet og vedlikeholdt av $1
  • Laster …
Jon Harald Søby (talk) 19:59, 2 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2022! Please help with this survey[edit]

Wiki Loves Monuments logo
Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Dear Jon Harald Søby,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2022, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again for a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 150K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 35 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey.

Please fill in this short survey and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2022.

Kind regards, Wiki Loves Monuments team, 09:38, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely,   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 10:13, 23 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Nyhetsbrev nr. 26 fra Wikimedia Norge[edit]

Jon Harald Søby (WMNO) 13:38, 5 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:ELGETAazal.jpg status[edit]

Hi Jon, hope you are doing well. Pretty tied up lately, so sadly somewhat missing. However, a user from the Basque Wikipedia told me he found issues with his VRTS processing of images, despite well-intentioned. Is there any way you could double-check the status of that file (File:ELGETAazal.jpg)? The VRTS licensing attempts may have been awkward, but I think it has all been fixed by now. Please let me know. Best regards Iñaki LL (talk) 12:30, 24 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I am not sure what broke, but the hero banner is broken on Commons:Wiki Loves Living Heritage in Singapore with the text being well outside of the banner image on legacy vector. Robertsky (talk) 15:01, 13 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Robertsky: Should be fixed now, please verify. The timing of my changes was accidental, so I understand why you thought they could be the culprit. The real culprit, however, was a change in how images are rendered in MediaWiki with the latest version that was rolled out today. Jon Harald Søby (talk) 16:11, 13 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Have verified. Thanks for following up. :) Robertsky (talk) 05:08, 14 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Nyhetsbrev nr. 27 fra Wikimedia Norge[edit]

Jon Harald Søby (WMNO) 07:21, 18 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Flag of Salzburg, Vienna, Vorarlberg.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2001:448A:11A6:13AF:8C68:B030:C0CA:D64 10:11, 21 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Skiptvet komm.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Worldlydev (talk) 15:00, 14 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]