User talk:ox1997cow

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, — regards, Revi 16:21, 25 January 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

FOP categorization[edit]

Hi, thanks for your work on FOP categorization. However, please include <noinclude></noinclude> within the FOP category so that the daily DR page would not appear on the category. --A1Cafel (talk) 02:17, 5 March 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@A1Cafel: I don't understand. What are you talking about? --Ox1997cow (talk) 02:22, 5 March 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Like Commons:Deletion requests/File:Statue du lycée George Sand.png. You just add [[Category:French FOP cases/pending]] without adding <noinclude></noinclude>. --A1Cafel (talk) 02:24, 5 March 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@A1Cafel: Thanks. I will add it. --Ox1997cow (talk) 02:25, 5 March 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Category discussion warning

NoFoP templates has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Ricky81682 (talk) 20:07, 22 April 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

SoKor - commissioned works[edit]

Hello Ox1997cow. Does the SoKor copyright law contain rules on commissioned works? If so, can you add it to COM:CRT/South Korea, in the section like that of COM:CRT/Mongolia#Commissioned works? Thanks! JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 13:29, 25 May 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@JWilz12345: What means commissioned works? Ox1997cow (talk) 14:01, 25 May 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Per COM:Commissioned works, "Commissioned works are works that are commissioned by one party and created by another." It is plentiful here: tarpaulins, municipal statues, and national monuments may be commissioned by the Philippine government (or the local governments), but created by different (and usually non-government) persons or individuals (like artists). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 14:31, 25 May 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@JWilz12345: I read South Korean copyright law, but I didn't find any articles related commissioned works. Ox1997cow (talk) 14:42, 25 May 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, I was thinking if you (or JWilz12345, or Liuxinyu970226) are going to modify the page Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Italy with the consensus from the discussion at the Village Pump. I can double check the edits, of course, but as long as you participated to the discussion, I suppose that you want to write yourself. Cheers --Ruthven (msg) 13:17, 5 June 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Ruthven: I don't understand. What can I edit for? Ox1997cow (talk) 13:47, 5 June 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I was saying to modify Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Italy accordingly with the consensus we've reached. Meanwhile, I can create the new template --Ruthven (msg) 14:22, 5 June 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Ruthven: I've edited the following three based on the results of the discussion.
Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Italy
Template:NoFoP-Italy/en
Template:NoFoP-Italy/ko
But I didn't edit Template:NoFoP-Italy/it because I can't write Italian. Ox1997cow (talk) 14:35, 5 June 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I've updated the text with references. I am working on a draft of the new template, following our discussion. --Ruthven (msg) 19:24, 5 June 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Ruthven: And what will you make the new template? Ox1997cow (talk) 14:43, 5 June 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Edit Summary[edit]

When editing a page on Commons there is a small field labeled "Edit Summary" or "Summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the Edit Summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the Edit Summary field. If you are adding a section, please do not just keep the previous section's name in the Edit Summary field - please fill in your new section's name instead. Thank you.  — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 18:23, 20 June 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Night view of Seokchon Lake.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 15:34, 11 July 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Translation markup[edit]

Please do not manually adjust the translation unit markers on translatable pages, such as <!--T:1-->, as you did in this edit. Those markers are used by the Translate extension to match paragraphs of the source page to translation pages, like these. If you move the markers away from the text they're supposed to represent, all translations of those units will have to be redone. For more information on editing translatable pages, please see mw:Help:Extension:Translate/Page_translation_administration#Changing_the_source_text. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 16:42, 13 July 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@AntiCompositeNumber: I'm sorry. After deleting the paragraph, I saw the empty numbers and thought I had to organize the numbers. Ox1997cow (talk) 01:02, 14 July 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
And don't add them either, like you did in this edit. Just let the software take care of them. The next available translation unit number isn't always the next number in the sequence, as units that were added and then removed retain their unit numbers. Just don't touch the unit markers, and please read the MediaWiki help page I linked previously. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 02:51, 24 July 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@AntiCompositeNumber: Oh, I see. Ox1997cow (talk) 09:40, 24 July 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Template:Change-of-KOGL has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this template, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

.     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:29, 10 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Overwatch[edit]

I think pretty much everybody already knows that this game isn't public domain. --Trade (talk) 19:01, 12 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Trade: I know. However, because there is a risk of uploading game screenshots without permission, I attached {{NoUploads}}. Ox1997cow (talk) 19:11, 12 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
How much of a problem is this actually? --Trade (talk) 19:12, 12 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Trade: Surprisingly, many people mistakenly believe that the copyright of a screenshot belongs to the person taking the screenshot, not the game company. Ox1997cow (talk) 19:42, 12 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

From Commons:Deletion requests#Closing discussions:

Deletion requests must not be closed by the nominator that created them unless done before anyone else has contributed to the request.

This makes sense, because although the nominator may no longer support deletion, other users may have their own reasons for supporting deletion. Brianjd (talk) 14:37, 31 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Brianjd: Oh, I see. Ox1997cow (talk) 14:46, 31 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
File:Microsoft Korea Building.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ellywa (talk) 12:34, 27 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Coins[edit]

Hi Ox1997cow, if you have the oppertunity, I made a list of the coins per design date on Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Money of North Korea. These coins could be listed in the top text section of the various undeletion categories, for instance Category:Undelete in 2025 for the coin of 1974, etc. This is not so much work it seems. We can delete what is necessary, but is nice to restore as much and as soon as possible. Ellywa (talk) 10:10, 7 December 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Ellywa: Thanks. Ox1997cow (talk) 10:16, 7 December 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Flickr2Commons[edit]

I have just come across a few images you have recently uploaded from Flickr. I would appreciate it if in the future, you used the Flickr2Commons tool. This tool allows images to be moved to Commons from Flickr without having to download the images to your own computer. It also brings in the largest resolution of the image, as well making sure to list the correct license and url, making it easy for the automated Flickr Review system. Also, it is fairly easy to categorize images with this tool. To use it, you just need to go to the url and authorize it (where it says "authorise first").--A1Cafel (talk) 07:22, 12 December 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks. Ox1997cow (talk) 10:17, 12 December 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Autopatrol given[edit]

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, the possibility to overwrite files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. rubin16 (talk) 13:38, 20 December 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Rubin16: Thank you. Ox1997cow (talk) 13:41, 20 December 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Template editor given[edit]

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted template editor right to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to work with templates. Please consider enabling two-factor authentication for your account. Furthermore, please look at Category:Commons protected edit requests (template protected) occasionally and try to help your fellow Commoners with responding to their edit requests. Thank you.

rubin16 (talk) 08:44, 23 December 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Australian Aboriginal flag[edit]

Hi, Could you please sort out what should be restored in Commons:Deletion requests/Australian Aboriginal flags? There are comments not related to the now extinct flag copyright. Thanks, Yann (talk) 19:55, 27 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The following files are excluded.
Ox1997cow (talk) 07:56, 28 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Sorry, but I don't understand. Do you mean these files are OK, or not? What about other files listed in the DR? Please ping me. Thanks, Yann (talk) 12:34, 28 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Yann: Files that have already been undeleted or have been excluded from undeletion because they are judged to be unrelated to the Australian Aboriginal flag. The rest of the files can be restored after determining whether or not to undelete them. Ox1997cow (talk) 13:46, 28 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
OK, I restored most of the files. Tell me if there are more. Thanks, Yann (talk) 15:13, 28 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello[edit]

Hello Ox1997cow! Can I reach out to you via social media (e.g. Facebook Messenger or Twitter)? The URL of my FB is the same as my username (only without "User:" of course). I will respect if you decline. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 18:02, 1 April 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@JWilz12345: I have Instagram account. See my page. You can send me Instagram direct message. Ox1997cow (talk) 18:15, 1 April 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Ox1997cow: I'm sorry, I do not have an Instagram account. :( JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:44, 2 April 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@JWilz12345: You can sign up for Instagram using your Facebook account. Ox1997cow (talk) 01:59, 2 April 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Ox1997cow, SLR. Thanks for suggestion and invite, but I don't want to maintain more social media accounts. Facebook/Messenger and Twitter are fine for me. My Discord has been "sleepy" for months. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:15, 3 April 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@JWilz12345: Oh, I found my Facebook account. I sent you my message via Facebook Messenger. Ox1997cow (talk) 17:02, 3 April 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Category discussion warning

Category:TOO-Malaysia has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Ellywa (talk) 10:51, 16 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:42, 9 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]


Notification about possible deletion[edit]

A page has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this gallery, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:13, 10 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Template:NoFoP-Denmark has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this template, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 08:13, 4 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Exterior of Gocheok Sky Dome.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 17:32, 4 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Dynamic Wave of Gocheok Sky Dome.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 17:32, 4 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Montage of Oldenburg's Sculptures.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

DMacks (talk) 23:54, 4 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Lukas Beck (talk) 12:23, 15 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Template:TOO-Germany has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this template, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Leyo 21:20, 30 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Copyright of coins of Canada[edit]

Hello,

On 11 August 2021, you changed [1] the introduction of Category:Coins of Canada by removing the reference to the Canadian Crown copyright of 50 years after the publication and by replacing it with a different copyright based on the life of the designer. Can you please explain in detail the rationale on which you based your decision to make that radical change? It seems to me from the Royal Canadian Mint Act [2] that the Crown corporation Canadian Mint, acting as an agent the Canadian Crown, acts under the control of the Crown and that the coins would be under Crown copyright according to section 12 of the Copyright Act [3]. -- Asclepias (talk) 14:27, 22 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

After I made {{Currency-category warning}}, I have applied this template to categories of banknotes and coins from countries that currently cannot upload their currency on Wikimedia Commons because these currencies are subject to copyright protection. Ox1997cow (talk) 16:26, 22 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
File:Seed Cube Changdong seen from Changdong Bridge 20230219.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 16:47, 5 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Template:NoFoP-Denmark has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this template, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 04:42, 11 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Category discussion warning

FoP-Italy has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


A1Cafel (talk) 11:57, 18 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Ox1997cow (talk) 04:45, 9 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]